Report documents women murdered for not having abortions

Pro-life leader says abortion community ignores issue

Crutcher

by Peter Grady –

A new report reveals the violent side of the pro-abortion movement with women being murdered for not being willing to undergo the procedure.

The report, Under-the-Radar Violence in the Conflict Over Abortion was produced by Life Dynamics, a pro-life group that conducts abortion research, documents 80 known cases of women who were murdered for the simple reason they did not want to kill their baby with an abortion.

Mark Crutcher, founder of Life Dynamics, says the abortion lobby is aware of the violence against women, but refuses to do anything to address it.

He claims to have acquired recordings of National Convention Federation conventions over the years where the issue is discussed, but says the prevailing attitude is one of “convenient indifference.”

“Their philosophical position seems to be that, even if a woman chooses to have an abortion she doesn’t want because of threats from others, it remains within the “pro-choice” purview since she was still the one who ultimately made the decision.”

The report blames the media for failing to accurately report these crimes. “The media’s coverage of these incidents often contains no mention of abortion. Instead, they either portray women who are attacked for refusing to have abortions as women who are attacked for getting pregnant; or they characterize the incident as one of simple “domestic violence” in which the victim’s pregnancy is basically inconsequential.”

One such example is Valicia Demery. When Bernard Bellamy Jr. learned she was pregnant he ordered her to have an abortion. When she refused, Bellamy ran her over with his car and left her to die. The night before the murder Bellamy sent Demery a text message telling her to come to her senses before it’s too late. When asked, “B4 what’s too late?” he replied, “ U will C.”

Crutcher said the modern feminist movement has hijacked the historic feminist position which was pro-life.

“One of the reasons that the early feminists in this country — the people like Susan B. Anthony, and Virginia Woodhall, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Alice Paul, who wrote the Equal Rights Amendment — the reason that these women were all opposed to the legalization of abortion was because they knew that it would be a weapon used by sexually irresponsible and sexually predatory males,” he explains. “It was not something that would profit women.”

Crutcher said while the murders listed are only the tip of the iceberg because there are numerous other women who are threatened, intimidated and coerced into having an abortion against their will that never report the incident to authorities because of the stigma surrounding the procedure.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trackback  •  Posted by Peter Grady in General News category

 
  • Cara says:

    A choice is always just that- a CHOICE. I will just as vigorously defend a woman’s right to choose to have a child (and have the resources she needs to care for it) as to choose to terminate a pregnancy in her own body. To suggest that a man murdering a partner who refuses an abortion is anyone’s fault except the murderer is disgusting. Furthermore, what would stop the same man from trying to force a woman to abort through illegal means if it were not legal or murdering her to terminate the pregnancy. This is an insane logic.

  • Paul says:

    Cara, I think the insane logic is that it could be legal to kill an unborn child. I’m not sure where you’re going with ”woman’s right to choose to have a child ‘and have the resources she needs to care for it’‘. If the mother carries a child to birth, someone else is supposed to insure that she has the resources?
    “To suggest that a man murdering a partner who refuses an abortion is anyone’s fault except the murderer…”- no the fault lies with society letting the genie (abortion) out of the bottle as a legal method to deal with our mistakes- or second thoughts.
    Finally, I do hope you understand that a pregnant woman is not a ‘single life’ anymore. She is charged with caring for that unborn child just as much as if it was born. Otherwise, why all the concern over ‘pregnancy and drinking or smoking’ or anything else that might hurt the baby. Why are drug companies sued over drugs that may harm an unborn child? It’s not a child until born, right?
    I can’t image growing up and ever finding out that my mother killed a sibling because …. {you can fill in the blank}.

  • Bob Roberts says:

    Might the amount of killings of the fetus bearing mother increase IF she did not have the option of abortion?

  • Ethan Lamoureux says:

    We need to develop a culture of life in this country. We need to be a society of people who value every human life as precious and unique, regardless of age or location or ability. We need to want more children. In a healthy society, children are everywhere! Abortion needs to be seen as murder, while large families are celebrated. Only then will we have truly regained the culture of life. If we do this, the murder rate will fall.

  • Kevin says:

    The murder rate of unborn children is through the roof. The father is already having the baby killed. Why would killing the mother cause him any more remorse then killing the child. These women would probably all be alive if abortion was never an option.

    These women died trying to save the lives of their unborn children. They died as mothers instead as accessories to murder.

  • Larry Hogue says:

    If someone was forcing a woman to buy a car against her wishes, would you recommend banning the sale of cars?

Please leave a reply...



You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>